Benefit vs harm

Edward

I wanted to create an alphabetical list of actions that cause pleasure or benefit to one party and suffering to the other. Some of these are looked down and illegal in our society, but some are still perfectly legal. But they all cause unnecessary suffering to somebody so I believe those should be reconsidered.

  • Animal testing
  • Bullfighting
  • Child molestation
  • Circuses with animals (including aquatic animals)
  • Dairy and eggs (in most cases)
  • Eating meat
  • Hunting / fishing
  • Kidnapping
  • Buying leather / fur
  • Murder / serial killing (depending on the killer and reason)
  • Pesticides / “pest” control
  • Racial cleansing
  • Rape
  • Slavery / low paid workers
  • Theft
  • Torture
  • Zoos (in some cases)
Bookmark and Share

3 Responses to “Benefit vs harm”

  • Eric Says:

    So you wouldn’t use pesticides if you place of residence were infested with termites and black widows?

    [Reply]

  • Tess Says:

    Eric makes a good point. Isn’t the non-use of pesticides also wrong when it risks disease and famine? In the case of animal testing, is it right if it does result in life-saving technology? Is hunting/fishing a more carbon-footprint friendly way of obtaining food than shipping it from a farm in Chile? Is it then less wrong?

    [Reply]

  • BenefitsGraphic Designsitegethostlook upsubmittingpiccreateinternetsale Says:

    Simply wish to say your article is as surprising. The clearness for your submit is just cool and that i could assume you’re a professional in this subject. Fine along with your permission let me to grasp your RSS feed to keep updated with impending post. Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply